Wild River Review
Wild River Review
Connecting People, Places, and Ideas: Story by Story
May 2010
Open Borders
 

April 29, 2010

OPEN BORDERS – The U.S. and Immigration

OPEN BORDERS – The U.S. and Immigration

Many Americans are children, grandchildren, or great grandchildren of immigrants from among many locations including immigrants from the last great boom – the 1920s: Russian, Eastern European, German and Irish.

They were called called Babushkas, Polacks, Krauts, and Micks, respectively; taunted, and at times told to “go home.” And yet, immigrants like my grandparents worked in factories and cleaned the toilets of their hosts, earned citizenship and enough money to send their own children to school, many of whom created the boom the US enjoyed during the second half of the 20th century.

In addition, these immigrants sent resources to “the old country,” to support their impoverished (less lucky in many immigrants’ opinions) relatives.  Immigration has been and is crucial to the growth of the United States. We are currently in the midst of another great immigration boom, powered by immigrants from Latin and South America. In 2008, an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants were living in the U.S. contributing their labor to the housing boom, planting fields and harvesting crops, cleaning toilets, mowing lawns, keeping restaurant kitchens going.

This week Arizona adopted the U.S.’s most stringent Immigration Laws, effectively putting illegal immigrants at risk.  Since 2009, Wild River Review has been publishing OPEN BORDERS, a series in which immigrants tell their own stories.  We invite you to join the conversation:

Joy E. Stocke, Editor in Chief

s-garcia

The first time I told my story to a group in the U.S., I had to cover my face with a bandana.  I was afraid for my life, since I had been labeled as an illegal alien.  I imagined myself being arrested by immigration agents, being deported and– once back in my homeland– being taken by soldiers, thrown into a secret prison and tortured to death without anybody ever knowing.

I had lost several members of my family at the hands of the Guatemalan military.  Afraid for my own life, I fled and crossed the US/Mexico border through the Arizona desert.  I was one of the lucky ones who made it to America, escaping from political persecution. I was fortunate because in the 1980’s many Americans were furious about their government’s wrong doing in the wars that afflicted Central America.  Some even risked their lives in defense of justice. As it has happened so many times in history, many innocent lives were lost in wars in the name of God and democracy.

I have spoken about my experience many times, about my reasons for having violated immigration law and about the importance of listening to the stories being told by many who, like me, had come to America to tell the truth.  And the question that really mattered: Whose truth was that? It was my truth, and whether people agreed with my truth or not, having the opportunity to tell my story in public saved my life.

I can say now, with all certainty, that I owe my life to those Americans who walked with me across the Arizona desert, to those who welcomed me –the stranger- in their homes and gave me food and shelter.  But most importantly, I owe my life to those who listened to me.

Being able to tell my story somehow helped me to own my own reality, to become more aware of what had happened to me and my family. It gave me a vehicle for expressing my grief in a constructive way.  Otherwise, I could have easily become severely depressed or self-destructive, or violently taken my rage out on other people.

Instead, telling my story saved me and made me better understand my own life, my dreams and my frustrations.  It helped me express ideas that would have otherwise remained hushed or unprocessed.  It even helped me an awful lot with improving my broken English.

My truth confronted the official truth.  Through my story I connected with many others who saw in me their own pain, who identified with me not because they felt we had issues in common, but because we had common values.  It was this connection that gave us hope and a sense of power.

Time has passed now and the wars have long been over.   However, twenty-something years later, more people continue to leave their homes and families behind in search for an opportunity in this land of milk and honey. For poverty sometimes can be the greatest killer.

During the last several years I have worked with many newcomers helping them to tell their story.  Listening to them has taught me more about the power of storytelling, that whether we record the story, film it, write it or simply follow it in reverent silence, the story is everything.

–Manuel Portillo, Series Creator and Editor

kids

It is time for immigrants in the United States to take back their stories—stories that have been re-written by people in a campaign to drive them out of the U.S. The revised stories read in the press and heard on the streets, promulgated by mayors and legislators and citizens who have a vision of America the Way It Used To Be go something like this: our towns are being taken over by (dark-skinned) immigrants who drive our crime rate up and overwhelm the criminal justice system; these immigrants drain our economy, sucking our resources for schools, health care and welfare programs; they take away jobs from Americans and drive our wages down; they don’t really want to be American—they stick to themselves, won’t learn English, they are only here to take advantage of our way of life and not contribute to it; and now, post- 911, they are a terrorist threat.  Citizens, we are being invaded, take back your communities before it’s too late.

One problem: the stories are not a true reflection of our community of immigrants. The truth is reflected more accurately in the story of Jesús Villicaña López, age 16, who picks mushrooms over 80 hours a week, lives in one room with eighteen men, and has built a new house for his family in Mexico.  Or the story of Sarbelia C., who teaches immigrants computer skills, trains them about their rights in case of an immigration raid, supports three families,  and grieves daily for her son in Ecuador who she hasn’t seen in seven years. Or Salvador Garcia, who had to sing La Bamba to the judge before she would grant him his green card. Or Mayra Castillo Rangel, a recent college graduate who is living the dream that brought her parents here.

Who is the rightful owner of our stories?  How do we give a voice to our lives? How to we find a way to be heard?  For the last three years at Open Borders Project / Proyecto Sin Fronteras, in Philadelphia, we have worked with immigrant teens and adults in the Healing Stories Project.  Participants record their stories, mix them with music, and share them on CDs, the radio, webcasts. The process of creating our stories and sharing them has been profound.  Listening to each other’s stories and reflecting on our common experience is an act of honoring our lives and affirming our dreams and sacrifices. Through our stories we develop a collective identity as immigrants. Telling our story allows us to take risks, to talk about missing our families, our isolation, our frustrations as we try to feel at home in our new world. Our stories create openings for conversations with our friends and family, to say things unsaid. And now we are taking our stories to the world—to immigration authorities developing deportation guidelines, legislators who are deciding whether to provide healthcare for undocumented children, communities terrified by the specter of immigration raids.  These stories must become part of The Great Immigration Debate.

We invite you to listen to some of these remarkable stories, filled with honesty and risk-taking and possibility and anger.  Over the next few months we will share stories of sacrifice, separation and grief, of teens who talk about pregnancy and homelessness and finding a way to connect with their father at a baseball game, of farmworkers who harvest our food, of the terror of immigration raids and deportation, of high school graduates who came to the U.S. ten years ago and whose dreams of going to college are deferred because they have no documents, of learning English while hanging on to their culture, of frontier justice.  And more. We will tell the story around the story—how sharing stories changes the way people see themselves, each other, the world.  How stories demand an act of listening—the basis of all relationships.  You will be able to listen to many of these stories on this website—three to six minutes in length, often produced by the storytellers themselves.  All will be in English; some will be in Spanish, as well.

Immigrant stories are part of a universal diaspora:  of Mexicans crossing the desert into Arizona, of Haitians going to the Dominican Republic, Turks going to Holland, Algerians going to France, Indians going to Dubai. These stories need to be told, demand to be heard, to set the truth straight, and create a dialogue between immigrant communities and their new countries.  Our stories give us a voice, make us visible. We invite readers of WWR to submit stories of the immigrant experience—both in writing and audio. We prefer that the stories be personal, telling the story of individuals while reflecting the universality of immigrant experiences. Written commentary that puts the story in context is also welcome. Our general guideline is to limit the audio to less than six minutes.

–Mark Lyons, Series Creator and Editor

To follow the series, click here: OPEN BORDERS.

To support Wild River Review’s mission to connect People, Places, and Ideas – Story by Story, Click Here: DONATE.

Join our mailing list and receiveWRR Monthly.

April 22, 2010

EARTH DAY 2010 – Eco-Chicism and the Stain of Sustainability

eco-chic

by Peter Soderman

It’s Earth Day here in New Jersey, which is like having a one-day moratorium on gambling in Vegas. Eco Chic is shaking up and shaking down the world with a post-nineteenth century Shaker furniture blowout frenzy. The coffers of the climate control complex are also filling quickly with government contracts.

I love my planet earth and, due to my own failed attempts at capitalism, try to practice a Buddhafied version of material minimalism with strict ownership abstinence. Because I don’t have any money this is self-righteously easy for me, although I’m environmentally shame-based about the grey and soot-filled fact that I’m from New Jersey, America’s ecological Armageddon to the lower forty-eight.

Most of the Eco-Chicism marketing movement is not really about going green as much as it is about handing over greenbacks and creating a good feeling for the consumer who is not willing to practice less consumption. It works on the same model as the diet industry by assuring any glutton that his or her hypothalamus has been lying to him and they will supply the easy fix.

Hollywood has gone green, rappers have gone green; and Oprahlitic, talked-out, name the category, survivors have gone green. Celebrities, rockers, and politicians have reinvented their careers and become pine-scented, pundit guardians. Barbie, the breast-enhanced, dimorphic doll made in China has gone green; and Mattel marketed a new eco-perfect Earth Day outfit to mark the occasion.

Coca Cola has gone green, invetsting $20 million to clean up the world’s waterways, but they need to change the color of the can. Having chased indigenous people away from the village well for decades, Coke, an insulin resistant water fountain to the world, is still providing the liquid candy corn syrup while serving the pancreatic needs of global contestants every day on American Aspiring Diabetic Idol.

Weapons systems manufacturer BAE Systems, an 18.5 billion dollar a year company, has gone green as in lead-free, creating environmentally friendly bullets capable of blowing away you and your entire family’s carbon footprint in one arching ire of an eco-friendly machine gun.

The alliterative marketing phrase “Clean Coal” is an oxymoron as much as the myth of the new “green” American Christmas ecological idol, Frosty the Coal Man. British Petroleum is still BP, but now it stands for Beyond Petroleum, which will be true when BP sells as much oil as they can until it’s all gone. Then, like anyone experiencing a loss, they will have to get beyond it.

A convoy of suburban tree companies has gone eco-linguic with names like SavATree and Lawn Doctor, where the tree surgeon will perform triage on the ailing elm in front of the children and the family iguana before it’s Dutch Elm Disease time and into the chipper. Most of this wood goes straight to the dump, Eighty-Sixville. Many tree companies don’t even sell firewood any longer.

SavATree (a reputable company) has a subdivision called SavALawn, which approaches any yard like a social worker with an inner city youth interventionist approach. Warning – Fescue at Risk

The carnival barkers of the Green Industrial Marketing Complex understand that it is all about educating the consumer in one way: Either you’re for the planet or against it.

Environmentalism is the new secular global religion and the cash cow is mooing in the field. Akin to donating to the Tazered Children’s Swine Flu Handicapped Fund, the least an earthfidel can do is tithe to their eco-charity of choice with a vague, but wallet-willing understanding. (see Josh Dorman’s web site, The Lazy Environmentalist.)

All of this keeps me vigilant and guarded like a good cynic in a Green Sopranos episode “I got a problem with that” kind of way, making me a nature-loving, mob-tied, shovel-hugging guy with an apostate’s conviction and meadowland way of knowing to look both ways when crossing a one-way Turnpike.

I’d swan dive off the outer railing of the Pulaski Skyway for Gaia and whack out any polluters, then bury them in soft Pine Barrens sand after hitting them over the head again with a shovel.

However, like any seagull could tell you at an all-you-can-eat, Alka Seltzer-sponsored shrimp buffet at the Fresh Kill Landfill, this cabal is out of control. Something is not right. The Greenwashing movement is unsustainable.

The poet CC Guile once called this the sustained stain of sustainability. Big Organtha has launched a similar sales strategy in what Michael Pollan calls the Organic Industrial Complex.

“You can eat this organic banana now, or die poisoned by the other to be found dead in your dacha with your all-natural, hemp fiber, goat placenta tote bag lying by your side. However, the bag will get recycled unlike your stiff and toxic corpse.

Let’s face it. This planet needs people like animals need the zoo. If you really care about the earth, you need to get off the grid, live in a yurt and eat buffalo grass; or practice a Wendell Berryan pact of minimalism, and then some kind of attempted husbandry such as sprouting your own avocado pit.

There is always the ultimate sacrifice I once saw advertised on bumper stickers in Boulder, Colorado: “Save the planet. Kill yourself.” Until I am gone or I flail off the railing of the Pulaski Skyway, I’m not buying any of it. I try to avoid the hype by keeping quiet in the woods and recycling everything.

Landscape artist, curator of ideas, Peter Soderman is the brainchild behind Writers Block andQuark Park. He is the subject of the film, American Landscaper.

To support our mission and passion for good storytelling, please make a tax-deductible donation by clicking here: Wild River Donation.

April 13, 2010

COLUMN – THINKING OTHERWISE: Child Abuse and the Catholic Church

Filed under: Wild Finance — Tags: , , , , — joystocke @ 12:22 pm

“We Irish Think Otherwise.” Bishop Berkely

fra-angelico“The Annunciation” by Fra Angelico

Secrets of the Confessional

(For Pope Benedict XVI)

Bless me, Father, for I have sinned.

It has been one week since I last

confessed and I have disciplined

that sin of peeking of the past,

but a friend had a picture book,

and I confess, I took a look.

Were these dirty pictures, my son,

girls, or boys with their pants undone?

(I’m thinking why would anyone

want to look at school boys undone

since he can see them every day

in the boys’ gym at towels’ play?

I began to see the priest had

more ideas of being bad

than I ever had and could teach me

how to flesh out his fantasy,

suggesting sins I could commit

or was too ashamed to admit.)

Poetry is not fiction, and the incident presented above actually happened to me in confession in Los Angeles at the age of eleven–before I quit the Church for Good (and I mean that literally) at the age of thirteen. I still remember my feelings of shock and wonder why anyone would want to look at pictures of naked or exposed young boys. The priest seemed quite interested in the act of confession as a kind of phone sex in which he asked me if I looked at pictures of boys, touched them “down there,” or touched myself “immodestly.”

At the time the boys in the schoolyard had invented a game called “Squirrels” in which they grabbed one another in the crotch and yelled “Nuts!” Being a philosophically inclined child, I remember wondering why they were always talking contemptuously about queers, but liked to grab one another’s nuts.

The tough Mexican pachuco who dominated the alpha male hierarchy of the seventh grade liked to brag about his seven inch cock, so we all began to take our school rulers home to see how we measured up to his standard. He also stole cars to impress us with his daring. As the best student with the highest grades in the class, I was, of course, beaten up, first by him, and then by his Aide-de-Camp. Ireland may have been “the Land of Saints and Scholars,” and is what E. R. Dodds called “a Guilt Culture,” but Mexico is a “Shame Culture” in which you are to identify with the students and their leaders, and not the teachers. Excelling beyond the group, except in athletics, is an act of group disloyalty. So I was asking for it when I was attracted to scholarship and learning.

I remember one day, his lieutenant got my Irish up and I exploded in a fury and beat him up. For this, I gained the respect of the pachuco—the word Anglos used for Mexican rat-pack gang members in the nineteen-fifties—and I was granted permission to exist. He was, after all, more powerful than the priests or the nuns in our parochial school; they might occasionally terrorize us, but he really terrified us. In recognition of his status, he had as his consort the pretty girl I liked, Marion—who at eleven already had full breasts. She, however, was only for him, but she would allow a schoolyard game in which you could push your fist slowly into her stomach which would cause her to stick her breasts farther and farther out toward you. Their fifties pointy bra-enhanced shadow covered my toes and my soul.

I also remember at our first school dance in the seventh grade that Archbishop (later Cardinal) J. Francis Macintyre dramatically appeared and shut it down because he was shocked to see us all dancing so close. Coeducation had consequences that had to be stamped out.

So the priest’s interest in boys puzzled me in the confessional, since precisely  because of coeducation I liked girls for all the obvious reasons, but also because they were allowed to be smart and get good grades, so you could actually talk to them. Guys at school never talked, they just shared primate identity-signals about sports teams, the best cigarettes, or getting their “first”–all to be cool and gain status. At home, after Sunday mass, my two older brothers and I would have long philosophical discussions with our Dad about whether God really existed, or whether Truman was a good President.

I was also interested in girls because I had no sisters at home but did have an Irish Catholic mother who was embarrassed at any talk of sex or reference to those body parts. I did not learn about the facts of life from her or my Dad, who lazily commissioned my older brother to explain the facts of life to me. My brother in his embarrassed efforts to explain sexual intercourse neglected to inform me that a woman had a vagina, because at 16 he didn’t really know all that much about sex himself. A year later at the age of twelve, after the unpleasant task of explanation was out of the way, my Protestant Scots-Irish father confided that if we were still doing things the right way that they used to do in the farmlands of rural Indiana when he was a boy, he would have taken me to his favorite whore and asked her to break me in. The alternative to the Catholic cosmology of sex and the Fall was the Protestant Enlightenment’s initiation into sex in a whore house. I didn’t get it, because I liked girls and just wanted to find out about sex with them.

To my knowledge at the time, no priest at Immaculate Conception School actually molested anyone, and the main sin of my group of altar boys was drinking the unconsecrated wine in the sacristy when the priest wasn’t around. Although no priest fondled or fellated me, I would still call the whole system of a Catholic education organized child abuse–of body, but especially of mind.

When I was seven and eight, I lived in a Catholic military boarding school all year round, summers included. When we moved from Chicago in 1945, there were no apartments in Los Angeles that were willing to take in noisy small children, so I was packed off to what was in effect a Catholic orphanage, where I was allowed to see my parents from 2:00 to 4:00 on Sunday afternoons after Mass. The school was run by a shell-shocked Major from World War II, who had a paddle with holes in it so that it would scream like falling bombs in the movies before it struck you. The other punishment–usually for fighting, insolence, or outright insubordination–was to stand in a uniform of collar and tie in the hot Southern California sun for the five hours between lunch and dinner. Children often fainted. I obeyed and was given holy cards, but I developed eczema and other psychosomatic allergies from life in that miserable penal colony.

I lived in a large dormitory of forty beds that was policed by a large scowling nun, who had a thick strap belt with which she would hit you on the calves or hands for slight infractions such as talking in ranks or talking back. She stood like a bouncer at a club by the open door of the boy’s room, and if you looked down at your penis in the fallen act of urination, she would yell: “Don’t look down. It’s evil!” Even at seven, I began to question the One True Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church by thinking to myself: “What am I supposed to do, pee on my shoes!?”

The Pope and the College of Cardinals and all the Pope’s Bishops would like us to believe that all the thousands of reported cases of child abuse are just the cases of a few bad apples. But let’s do a little thought experiment to test this official theory.

Imagine that you are creating an institution in which you first exclude women because they are the source of the Fall and the presence of evil in the world. Then create for this institution a special faculty of priests who are not allowed to have any sexual relations whatsoever and certainly not with these evil women. Sex with women was like the fall of the soul into matter. Then further imagine that these special men get to wear long skirts called soutanes, and that the best of them get promoted and are allowed to wear lovely skirts with purple sashes, and for the best of the best, flaming taffeta dresses with lovely white lace negligees and the most gorgeous jewelry and costly accessories. And, best of all, these privileged men are granted a cadre of young choristers with angelic, unchanged voices and a following of assistants of young altar boys. What kind of people do you think would be attracted to such an institution?

Choir Boys

Not the organ answering Job out of the whirlwind,

nor the tiny pointed notes of the harpsichord–

metallic and discrete as knights in armories

unfurled and elevated above the clubbed blood

of churlish battle or bones struck on mammoth skulls,

nor the sun’s arteries drained in stained-glass truncheons;

bound in cassocks to their claustral occulted place

where priestly functions anoint the choir boys’ throats

in Borborite eucharist older than the Mass,

cherub buttocks lean on the misericord’s hard love

tangled in wings of the dove and coils of the snake

that soon break sunset’s shaft on the rising full moon;

but now the pianoforte in thundering halls

breaks the hold in revolution’s noisy applause.

So the God’s Truth is that the One True Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church is in its deepest essence an institution built on the hatred of women camouflaged by its adoration of the Blessed Virgin Mary–she of the Immaculate Conception. From Mary Magdalene on, the control of women and families has been through fabricated doctrine. In my extended family, one woman was warned by her doctor that if she had another child with her failing kidneys, she would either die of renal failure or go insane from uremic poisoning. She consulted her priest in the confessional, who told her it was god’s will and she had to have the child– the same priest who before had told her birth control was evil. She spent the rest of her life in an insane asylum.

To run an institution like the Catholic Church, you first have to promote this alienated class of men so that they can take charge of women and families through its control of sexuality. Next you have to take charge of history, and fabricate a myth of apostolic succession upon which to found your claim to a higher authority. To accomplish this Stalinist task of rewriting history, the early Church fathers rejected any documents they didn’t like, especially those like The Gospel of St. Thomas that showed that Jesus recognized the sacrality of women. A century or more after Jesus, they constructed Gospels that they doctored up to say were written by Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, and dismissed all the others as Apocrypha or Gnostic heresies.

In the early years of Anno Domini, the standard practice to gain authority for a text was to sign it with the name of a famous personage; thus we have the angelology of the Pseudo-Dionysus. Once Bishop Irenaeus of Lyon had constructed an orthodox canon by eliminating the Gnostics, the Church moved on to consolidate its institutional structures of power. Although the legendary Jesus was said to be a simple man of no fixed address and a wardrobe of one seamless robe, the Church Fathers created an institution of hierarchy and palaces for Bishops and Popes who would sit on thrones and give sermons about the virtues of poverty.

So it is not a case of a few rotten apples in the bushel; the whole institution is rotten at the core. To be sure, there are good folks in the Church doing good work in spite of the Vatican and the Hierarchy, and who sincerely believe that Catholicism is the religion of Christ and not simply the religion about Christ. But what we are experiencing in all the reports of child abuse now is a new revelation in which we must indeed regain the innocence of little children before they were indoctrinated by the Church if we are to enter the kingdom of heaven.

Once Isis and Osiris was the religion of a Magnus Annus in the zodiacal precession of the equinox, then it was Jesus and Mary for the age of Pisces. Now in this new millennium, we are experiencing the cultural evolution from religion to a personal spirituality in which the unique mind learns how to immerse itself in the Universal Mind through a process of meditation: no churches, mosques, or temples needed.

In evolution, both natural and cultural, nothing ever disappears, it is simply incorporated into a larger structure. Ancient mitochondria still exist, but they are now part of the larger and more complex eukaryotic cell. So paganism did not disappear, but was incorporated into the magical rituals and relics of the Catholic Church, and pagan gods like Brigid were transformed into saints. Prehistoric shamanism is still being practiced, so I don’t expect to see the Catholic Church fade entirely away like the withering of the state in the Marxist utopian fantasies of communism.

At the present moment, the Catholic Church is in denial, lashing out at the New York Times and other media for exposing it, and closing ranks to defend the Pope: all of which is precisely the kind of behavior that got it into trouble in the first place with a philosophy of “protect the Church, not the children.”

For the Catholic Church to survive its current global crisis, I do believe a second Reformation will be needed and require a demotion of the infallible Pope as the singular Vicar of Christ on Earth to simply the human and fallible Bishop of Rome, a Bishop who would co-exist in a Christian ecology of mind in which the Bishops of the Syriac, Coptic, Ethiopian, Armenian, Celtic, Anglican, Greek and Russian Orthodox, and American Episcopal Churches were all recognized as equals. As in the case of the American Episcopal Church, priests should marry and women should be admitted to the priesthood, with celibacy reserved for nuns and monks. Since I don’t expect this Pope and College of Cardinals, or any future Pope and College, ever to be willing to demythologize its pretensions to authority through its fictitious doctrine of the apostolic succession, I expect they will continue as they are, and Catholics such as I will simply leave and move on to “fresh woods and pastures new.”

In Matthew 6:5-6, we are counseled not to pray and proselytize on street corners to impress our fellows, but to go into our closet and pray in secret to our Father in Heaven. In a personal and contemplative spirituality we learn how to quiet the linguistic prattle of the fidgeting monkey mind, and to follow the words of Psalm 46:10 , “Be still and know that I am God.”

Free Street

A parking cop marks the tires

with chalk before he writes a ticket

for the over-stayed residents of time.

I marked out Portland with poems

as I prepared to move on in.

Impermanence is good for Buddhists.

We Judeo-Christians need to nail

down time to God, after all we

crucified Christ in Jerusalem

and Christianity in Rome.

Powered by WordPress

Archives