Wild River Review
Wild River Review
Connecting People, Places, and Ideas: Story by Story
May 2010
Open Borders
 

November 18, 2009

PEACE TALKS with Harriet Mayor Fulbright: Testimony on Health Care

(Editor’s NoteThis is the seventh in a series of  Wednesday talks with Harriet Mayor Fulbright, President and Founder of the J. William and Harriet Fulbright Center.)

Testimony - Hearing on Health Care and Public Option

2141 Rayburn House Office Building

Washington DC - 27 October 2009

Harriet Mayor Fulbright

Harriet Mayor Fulbright

I would like to thank you and your colleagues for providing leadership on this most important topic namely, a health care bill with a public option. It is in the tradition of the hearings of my late husband, Senator J. William Fulbright – public hearings on issues of supreme importance to the American people. I can think of no subject more important than health care for every citizen of this country.

And I talk about this from personal experience. A little over ten years ago a very rare blood cancer called Waldenstrom’s Macroglobulinemia slowly began to dominate the marrow of my bones. The progress of the doctors who were trying to figure out why this supposed simple case of anemia was not responding properly to tried-and-true methods of eliminating the condition was even slower because it took a more complicated blood test to arrive at the proper diagnosis of a cancer that is not simple nor is it anemia and is, indeed, incurable and deadly.

The ensuing year was a struggle. I felt as if I were living on transfusions, which were necessary every two to three weeks. The subsequent sessions with a chemotherapy agent slowly dripping into my arm were more uncomfortable because of the extreme fatigue that followed, but my concerns were not the immediate situation. It was the future that had me worried. I was used to traveling, sitting up late writing speeches such as this one, gardening and playing with my grandchildren. That was “living,” not this routine.

My doctor at Johns Hopkins, whom I liked from the start, finally told me that even though the chemo was indeed killing the cancer, it was also causing such damage to my immune system that he felt I needed a second opinion and suggested that I go to the Dana Farber Cancer Institute. (See  Mrs. Fulbright’s August 19 Peace Talk immediately following this post.) Dr. Stephen Treon agreed to see me, and a few months later my life began to improve. The complete transformation you now see before you came slowly but feels to me like a miracle. I am not and cannot be cured but I am in complete remission.

And it came about because of a medical team extending around the world – doctors who shared research findings and techniques freely, swapping patient stories in an effort to treat us all with greater efficiency and compassion, brainstorming ideas about how to spread the word about this disease so that future Waldenstrom’s patients will not go through a year or more of frustrating treatments for the wrong malady.

I also want to emphasize that I was able to take advantage of all this medical expertise because my health insurance, which came from my Senator husband, is the best this country has to offer and should be available to all US citizens. Without it I would now be deeply in debt or dead, unable to afford the extremely expensive and prolonged treatments.

And while I would never choose to experience this or any other life threatening disease, I am eternally grateful for what it has taught me. The disease has shown me who my friends are and introduced me to more wonderful people. It reintroduced me to my family and made me realize that our deep caring for each other was priceless and needed more nurturing. It has taught me what it takes to be a real companion. It has made me realize that fancy titles, prizes, medals and honors are no match for loving human relationships.

Over time it has also raised my sights to look at the wider world. You here at this hearing on health care are, or should be, an example for other groups. It is a collaborative effort, and therefore more powerful. Senator Fulbright understood the transforming power of collaborative efforts and established an international education exchange program founded on that principal. He would, I am sure, applaud you for your efforts and often spoke of what makes the United States of America such a magnet for so many:

“It is not our affluence or our plumbing or our clogged freeways that grip the imagination of others. Rather, it is the values upon which our system is built. These values imply our adherence not only to liberty and individual freedom but also to international peace, law and order, and constructive social purpose. When we depart from these values, we do so at our peril.” He went on to say that “our future is not in the stars but in our own minds and hearts” and that “creative leadership and liberal education, which in fact go together, are the first requirements for a hopeful future for humankind.” This group adds to that hope, and I thank you for that from the bottom of my heart.

Harriet Mayor Fulbright is president and founder of the J. William and Harriet Fulbright Center, which works to create peace through education exchange programs around the world.

November 10, 2009

Dieting Inc.

Filed under: Wild Finance — Tags: , , , , , — joystocke @ 3:40 pm

by Kim Nagy

Photo by Joy E. Stocke              

Photo by Joy E. Stocke

After viewing the 1995 documentary, Slim Hopes (in a showing sponsored by The Girls Institute for Empowerment, a local group based out of New Jersey) produced by the Media Education Forum, I couldn’t help but scratch my head and think of a French saying:  

“Plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose.”

“The more things change, the more they stay the same.”

Slim Hopes narrated by Jean Kilbourne was clearly dated, and it was sad to note (particularly as the mother of a six-year old) that the main subject of the film–the national U.S. obsession with dieting (especially among women)– has not changed but intensified. 

In 2008, Business-Week reported that each year Americans spent “40 billion dollars on weight-loss programs and products.” From Jenny Craig to Dr. Atkins products, a lot of cold hard caloric abstinence and/or food substitution. 

I have to admit that I actually enjoyed my low-tech (completely free) first-time diet around the age of 13 many many years ago.  My weapon of choice was calorie counting and I guess you could call it a scaled back form of starvation. I lost weight quickly and in the beginning I kind of liked the self-imposed hunger I held inside (and heard inside my grumbling stomach) until I let myself devour the most amazing Chef’s Salad, ever, around dinner time. The food tasted more flavorful when I ate less—and the good news was I ate more vegetables. I felt so awake and aware for the first few days but the honeymoon didn’t last.

Soon, I got spacey, confused and started to drag.  I couldn’t sleep. My mom got worried (though she was a dieter herself) when the scale dropped to 100 pounds and I communicated no plans to alter my new lifestyle. In my mind, the more weight I lost, the more I had a chance of having some pretty skinny girls’ legs rather than my own ridiculously muscular thighs and calves (that of course stayed muscular no matter what) that never seemed to fit into the right jeans. But that night, my mom and I talked and with her urging, we made dinner together—and I ate it all. 

My mom used my favorite foods to sway me from my diet and perhaps not much else would have worked.  Because had you warned me that severe caloric restriction in girls my age could result in osteoperosis and hormonal problems later in life, it probably wouldn’t even have even registered as a mild concern.  I mean, that was later, right? My problem was right now: How was I ever going to look like a skinny girl in gym class?

Which is really what the philosophy of dieting is all about—immediate gratification with a hefty dash of all too human but nevertheless a media-inspired neurosis.

I completely agree with the documentary Slim Hopes in questioning a societal obsession that has girls as young as eight stressing about their diet (this age has actually gone down to age 7 and younger in 2009) And the salacious nature of an advertising industry that “sells” an unrealistic body type over and over again—as though it were the only answer to every problem—and the greatest depiction of health.

But though Slim Hopes depicts an amoral advertising industry with a huge misogynist streak—I was a little skeptical of its wholesale castigation of “them”. 

Because who is the advertising “industry” and did “they” alone invent using women only as sexual objects? Did our expectations simply become more photo-edited and/or homogenous? Is there a larger problem in a centuries old belief system that instructs women that their greatest hope for material security and the most important creative use of their time is to ensnare a man through the sole use of their looks? (And what does it mean that girls as young as seven are convinced their worth stems mainly from what they wear and how they look.) Are girls taught that what they think and say will be valued at all?

On the other hand, for adults, men and women, is wanting to be attractive a locked-in part of our biology? And can we honestly say that this is one-hundred-percent bad? Should we be honest and realistic with our children so as to guide them through some tricky navigation?

 As for diets, I swore them off long ago, but my favorite non-dieting advice now comes from author of In Defense of Food by Michael Pollan:

“Eat Food. Not Too Much. Mostly Plants.”

Powered by WordPress

Archives